Certifications
What the vendor claims, and how far each claim has been independently corroborated. A claim is only ever as strong as the rung it reaches.
Described as 'certified' on the Responsible AI page and 'compliant' on product pages; no issuer, certificate number or scope statement published.
- ✓ Vendor claimed
- ✓ Evidence cited
- — Registry corroborated
- — Scope verified
- — Current
Announced via blog (September 2025); no certificate details or scope published.
- ✓ Vendor claimed
- ✓ Evidence cited
- — Registry corroborated
- — Scope verified
- — Current
Named only in passing alongside ISO 42001 and 27001; no explicit certification statement, issuer or scope.
- ✓ Vendor claimed
- ✓ Evidence cited
- — Registry corroborated
- — Scope verified
- — Current
Stated on product pages; report, period and auditor not published.
- ✓ Vendor claimed
- ✓ Evidence cited
- — Registry corroborated
- — Scope verified
- — Current
Supply chain
Third parties this vendor’s AI depends on, as disclosed in its own public material. Responsibility transfers; accountability doesn’t.
How to read this
This assessment is automated and point-in-time, built only from evidence the vendor publishes publicly plus checks against official certification registries. It is not an audit, not a certification, and not an endorsement. A low score means public evidence was thin or uncorroborated - which is a finding about disclosure, not proof of a weak control environment. Where too little was found to characterise a product at all, no score or grade is published rather than a low one: absence of evidence is not a number, and a letter grade would read as a verdict on the vendor when it would only be a verdict on what we could collect. This record reflects the evidence available on Oct 21, 2026.