← Trust Directory

Thinking Machines Lab

thinkingmachines.ai · 1 assessment

Thinking Machines Lab - organisation
Approve with conditions
3 items to confirm in writing
Assessed Oct 21, 2026 · public evidence coverage 45% · evidence confidence medium · methodology 0.7.1

Certifications

What the vendor claims, and how far each claim has been independently corroborated. A claim is only ever as strong as the rung it reaches.

ISO/IEC 42001
Not claimed

Not claimed in any public source scanned. This is the AI-management-system certification — in its absence, the vendor’s AI governance rests on its general security and privacy certifications.

  • — Vendor claimed
  • — Evidence cited
  • — Registry corroborated
  • — Scope verified
  • — Current

Supply chain

Third parties this vendor’s AI depends on, as disclosed in its own public material. Responsibility transfers; accountability doesn’t.

Models: Inkling, Inkling-Small
Infrastructure: Google Cloud, Cloudflare
Subprocessors: WorkOS
AI providers: OpenAI (Moderation API)

How to read this

This assessment is automated and point-in-time, built only from evidence the vendor publishes publicly plus checks against official certification registries. It is not an audit, not a certification, and not an endorsement. A low score means public evidence was thin or uncorroborated - which is a finding about disclosure, not proof of a weak control environment. Where too little was found to characterise a product at all, no score or grade is published rather than a low one: absence of evidence is not a number, and a letter grade would read as a verdict on the vendor when it would only be a verdict on what we could collect. This record reflects the evidence available on Oct 21, 2026.